Source Evaluation

16/09/13

Source
Evaluation
Marks, Lara. Sexual Chemistry: A History of the Contraceptive Pill. Yale CN. Yale University Press. 2001.
This was my most important source. It surveys many aspects of the Pill’s impact. It was a great source of ideas for directions in which I could take my research. Marks is the preeminent academic working in the UK on this subject. Her bibliography helped with pointing me towards other sources that could be used to measure the Pill’s effect on women’s choices.
Akerlof et al. ‘An Analysis of Out-of-Wedlock Childbearing.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics. Oxford University Press. 1996.
In this paper Akerlof et al approach the impact of the Pill from a unique standpoint. It was interesting to see how the invention of the Pill can be interpreted to have an adverse effect on the welfare of women, especially to those who don’t actually take it. Again the paper is from a reputable source and is therefore to be reliable. The data is focused on the US however, so I had to take consideration when using the theory by backing it up from evidence in the UK.
Botting et al. Trends in fertility and contraception in the last quarter of the 20th century. Demography and Health. National Statistics. 2010.
This paper was incredibly useful in providing data on the popularity of the Pill. It provided data on the popularity of different contraceptives that allowed for me to trace the pills raise and decline in popularity. Again it is from a reliable governmental source. When combined with the theories put forward by Marks it was very interesting to see the rise in popularity of sterilisation- an curious impact of the Pill invention.
Bolton, Paul. Education: Historical Statistics. Social & General Statistics. Parliamentary Briefing Paper. 2012.
This paper produced by the UK government provided good basic data on the gender split of education among other things. It is a very reliable source, not based on sampling. It is aggregate UK data.
Pissarides, Christopher. Pietro, Garibaldi. Olivetti, Claudia. ‘Women in the Labour Force: how well is Europe doing?’ Women at work: an economic perspective. Oxford University Press. Oxford. 9-120 .2005
This was a crucial source when looking at women’s employment data. There is very little academic literature on the subject so it was important that I could collect specific data, especially on the impact of having children and the importance of a professional university degrees. One of the countries leading economists the data Pissaredes presented can be seen as very accurate, however my inability to access more recent sources means that I am stuck with data from 8 years ago as opposed to 2.
Cohen, L. ‘The ‘pill’, promiscuity, and venereal disease.’ British Journal of Venereal Diseases. 1970. Vol. 46. Iss. 2. 108-11. 

A British Medical journal article from 1970 this source is useful both in the data it presents as well as when looking at the kind of attitudes people had towards oral contraception a decade after its invention. The report also documents the changing class type of the women using the pill, which was crucial part IV of the report.
‘Households and families.’ Social Trends. ONS. Vol. 40. Iss. 1.2010. 13-26.
This is a reliable government source which I used to see the breakdown of household and family size. Social trends is a flagship publication by the Office of National Statistics.
Office for National Statistics. Frequently asked questions: births and fertility. August 2011.
Again a reliable governmental source that quotes aggregate UK data. Recently edited.
Cartwright, Ann. “Family Size, contraceptive practice and fertility intentions in England and Wales 1967-1975.” Family Planning Perspectives. 128-37. General Household Survey. London. 1979.
Ann Cartwright is another recognised academic in her field. Her article was invaluable to me not only because it provided in-depth data on family size, and contraceptive practice it gave a human side to the report. By providing statistics, used through sampling, on women’s attitudes towards their most recent pregnancies I was able to incorporate human evidence into my report, making the reader see how important the oral contraceptive was to women in the 1960s and 70s. Published in 1979 it is limited, however, as although it provides in-depth data on the 10 years before that it would have been interesting to see the effect of the Pill in the long term.
Goldin, Claudia and Lawrence, Katz. ‘The power of the pill: Oral contraceptives and women’s career and marriage decisions. Journal of Political Economy 110 (4). Harvard University.2002. 
Goldin and Katz and leading academics on the impact of the pill. Published in the journal of political economy their theories are now commonly known in the field. This report is mainly focused on the impact of the Pill in the US- a fact I talk about in the report itself. I used the theories it presented and backed them up using data and evidence from the UK to find that oral contraceptives did indeed have a big impact of women’s career and marriage decisions.
Siegel Watkins, Elizabeth. On the Pill: A Social History of Oral Contraceptives. John Hopkins University Press. 2001
Important piece of academic literature when looking at the social importance of the Pill. Was mainly used a guide to what I should be researching as the book revolves around the impact of the Pill on the US. One of the two most acclaimed books in it’s field.